Följ oss
the_ad_group(12516);

Nyheter

2015 From Cyclical to Structural

Publicerad

den

2015 From Cyclical to Structural

China Macro Monitor 2015 From Cyclical to Structural. After half a year of spectacular equity market performance to some the clouds of slowing economic growth cast doubt on China’s ability to maintain the rally.

However, that view over-emphasises the correlation between GDP performance and equity market performance. The link between economic and equity market performance has never been straight-forward. Indeed, China may follow a path similar to Japan, South Korea and Taiwan during their early stages of development. That indicates that equity market performance will accelerate during periods of financial market liberalisation rather than periods of strong economic growth.

A number of exogenous events may also prove to be supportive for both China’s domestic equity market and China’s role in the global economy. MSCI is due to evaluate the inclusion of China A-Shares in its Emerging Markets Index this June. The IMF is also due to conduct its five-yearly Special Drawing Rights (SDR) basket review this October. Renminbi inclusion discussions could become a catalyst for significant currency market liberalisation and a seismic shift in the role of the Chinese currency in international trade and finance.

We expect reform to remain the focus of policy makers’ agenda this year, with lower economic growth an acceptable by-product of stability. The authorities are unlikely to let growth fall substantially lower however, as that could stoke political unrest and undo the hard work of the reform agenda. We expect some policy easing, primarily in the form of lower interest rates and a reduction the Reserve Requirement Ratio in coming months.

ETFSChina1

A ROCKY PATH TO STABILITY

Although Chinese GDP growth of 7.4% in 2014 surpassed consensus expectations, it was the lowest reading in 24 years. The outlook for growth is lower still in 2015. Both the World Bank and IMF have downgraded their 2015 China growth forecasts to below 7%t this month. The message from policy makers in China is that sub-7% growth is acceptable, so long as its reform agenda continues apace.

Over the next decade China’s growth model will migrate away from cheap-currency dependent mercantilism and China will become increasingly more capitalist. Market forces will help the allocation of resources1 and the legal framework will be strengthened to improve quality of China’s institutional infrastructure2.
Transition will inevitably involve winners and losers, but society as a whole is likely to benefit from the new model. China will be careful not to move too quickly and aggravate political instability. With that in mind, it is likely that China will stimulate the economy further in 2015 to avoid a marked slowdown, especially in light of a faltering Euro area dampening global demand their good and services.

In spite of economic growth deceleration in H2 2014, the domestic equity market rallied 58%3. That is not unusual and the experiences of Japan, South Korea and Taiwan in their transition paths in earlier decades highlight that this is what we should expect. For example in Japan during the 1960s, a period of financial repression, the stock market underperformed relative to the overall economy. However in the 1980s when economic growth was subdued relative its past, the stock market performed particularly well in an environment of financial market liberalisation. South Korea and Taiwan experienced similar bouts of equity market outperformance during periods of financial market liberalisation, which countered the underperformance during earlier periods of financial repression and relatively stronger growth.

ETFSChina2

We believe China’s equity market underformance in recent years prior to the opening up of the Hong Kong-Shanghai Connect initiative in November 2014 was a symptom of a lack of market access. The Connect initiative significantly opened up market access. The fact that volumes traded on the Connect have not met expectations is irrelevant. The market has priced Shanghai stocks as internationally accessible now. The eventual opening of a Shenzhen Exchange link4 will give further access to Chinese domestic stocks, which will also become priced-in at some point.

We are likely to see equity market volatility rise. While structural shifts will move the equity market higher, periodic disappointment over growth figures are likely to lead to frequent corrections. This tug-of-war between the structural and cyclical drivers of the market will continue to divide analysts and see volatility remain high. Investors attracted to the recent rally should recognise the need for a significant degree of risk tolerance to weather rising market volatility.
In 2014, it was clear that Chinese equities were cheap by international standards. That is no longer the case. The MSCI China A-Share P/E is now close to the MSCI World P/E. P/Es in 2009 were undesirably high (it was a period of earnings weakness and price optimism in light of policy easing) and so should not be treated as a benchmark for where equity markets should go back to. Trading China on cheapness should be a thing of the past. Investing in China is once again about buying into structural change.

ETFSChina3

THE GLOBAL STAGE AWAITS

A number of events this year could prove to be a catalyst for further capital market deepening in China.
Firstly in June, MSCI will reconsider whether to include domestic Chinese equities into its emerging markets index. With approximately US$1.5tn benchmarked to MSCI China Emerging Markets Index, even a small allocation of 0.5% to the China A-Share market in the broader index could drive US$7.5bn into the market on the back of index replication by investors.

As a point of reference, the MSCI United Arab Emirates Net TR USD index rose over 90% between the time MSCI announced UAE stocks would enter its Emerging Market Index and actual inclusion (see shaded area of chart). While the Chinese and UAE markets are vastly different in size and composition, we believe the increasing probability of index inclusion will bode well for China A-Shares.

ETFSChina4

Secondly, in October the International Monetary Fund will review which currencies it will include in its Special Drawing Rights (SDR) currency basket. The SDR is an international reserve asset, created by the IMF in 1969 to supplement its member countries’ official reserves. Its value is based on a basket of four key international currencies, and SDRs can be exchanged for freely usable currencies. If the Renminbi is included in the basket, central banks buying/selling SDRs will have to deliver/receive Renminbi (in proportion to its weight in the basket).

In its last review in 2010 the IMF decided not to widen the currencies in the basket. At the time the IMF noted that China was the third largest exporter of goods and services but felt that the Renminbi was not a freely useable currency. However, they urged that this issue be kept under review. Since then, the Chinese Yuan has become the fifth most used payment currency according to SWIFT5, jumping from seventh position only a year earlier. The Renminbi became the ninth most actively traded currency according to the Bank of International Settlement’s 2013 triennial survey, jumping from 17th position in 2010. Over that period average daily turnover soared from US$34bn in 2010 to US$120bn in 2013.

ETFSChina5

Significant expansion in RMB offshore clearing centres around the world has helped fuel this trend and access to the currency has never been easier. In 2014, the Yuan-HK Dollar convertibility cap was abolished in recognition of the demand for Renminbi (timed with the opening of the Hong Kong-Shanghai Stock Connect initiative).

While capital and exchange rate controls will continue to hold back the Renminbi from SDR inclusion, we believe the IMF’s review this year will facilitate a road-map for further internationalisation of the currency. With the internationalisation of the Renminbi a stated policy objective we believe that the Chinese authorities will continue to dismantle controls on the currency.

With the Yuan trading very close to the edge of its trading band (see chart on front page), we could see further flexibility in the trading band this year. The recent depreciation against the US Dollar seems to be more about the strength of the US dollar than Yuan weakness, with the nominal effective rate actually having appreciated in December. Indeed there has been no increase in foreign exchange reserves that would occur if the authorities were intervening to depreciate the currency.

ETFSChina6

POLICY EASING IN 2015

With consumer price inflation weakening and property prices continuing to fall, we expect the Peoples Bank of China (PBoC) to cut interest rates further this year. We also expect the central bank to cut the Reserve Requirement Ratio (the amount of reserves banks need to hold with the central bank), thus improving banks’ ability to lend.
The transition away from shadow banks to the formal banking sector will continue in 2015, increasing pressure on the PBoC to provide liquidity support to banks. On January 22nd the PBoC injected CNY50bn into the banking system through the 7-day repo market. That was one of the many injections the central bank has provided in the past six months (see page 10 for other examples) and we expect the PBoC to maintain a strong hand on facilitating the transition in the financial sector.

ETFSChina7

1 “The focus of the restructuring of the economic system… is to allow the market [forces] to play a ‘decisive role’ in the allocation of resources”, Third Plenum Communiqué, November 2013
2 ”Comprehensively advancing the rule of law”, Fourth Plenum Communiqué, October 2014
3 MSCI China A-Share, between 30 June 2014 and 31 December 2014
4 Although no formal announcement has been made, Premier Li Keqiang has openly encouraged the opening of an Shenzhen link
5 December 2014

Important Information

This communication has been provided by ETF Securities (UK) Limited (”ETFS UK”) which is authorised and regulated by the United Kingdom Financial Conduct Authority. When being made within Italy, this communication is for the exclusive use of the ”qualified investors” and its circulation among the public is prohibited.

Fortsätt läsa
Annons
Klicka för att kommentera

Skriv en kommentar

Din e-postadress kommer inte publiceras. Obligatoriska fält är märkta *

Nyheter

Vem ska ha en LEI-kod?

Publicerad

den

Alla juridiska personer – företag, stiftelser, organisationer, föreningar, banker, försäkringsbolag etc. – som hanterar finansiella transaktioner, aktier, obligationer och andra värdepapper måste ha en LEI-kod.

Alla juridiska personer – företag, stiftelser, organisationer, föreningar, banker, försäkringsbolag etc. – som hanterar finansiella transaktioner, aktier, obligationer och andra värdepapper måste ha en LEI-kod.

Din bank måste registrera din LEI-kod innan de genomför värdepapperstransaktioner för din räkning, så de har förmodligen redan meddelat dig om du behöver en LEI-kod.

Var kan jag få tag på en LEI-kod?

Du kan beställa en LEI-kod från en rad olika registratorer, till exempel hjälper LEI Service alla bankkunder i Sverige, oavsett vilken bank du använder. Priset på LEI-koder beror ofta på om det är en registrering eller en förnyelse. LEI Service har dock valt att erbjuda samma låga pris för både förnyelse och registrering av en ny LEI-kod.

Behöver jag en LEI-kod i Sverige?

I Sverige måste du ha en LEI-kod om du:

  1. Har ett företag eller annan juridisk enhet med ett organisationsnummer som handlar med aktier, obligationer eller andra typer av värdepapper.
  2. Har en juridisk enhet utan organisationsnummer, som handlar med aktier, obligationer eller andra typer av värdepapper

Fysiska personer, inklusive enskilda näringsverksamheter (enskild firma), är undantagna.

När krävs en LEI-kod?

Sedan januari 2018 har det varit ett krav för alla företag i EU att ha en LEI-kod för att köpa eller sälja aktier och obligationer. En LEI-kod har krävts för handel med värdepapper sedan november 2017. Observera att det gäller även om du handlar med aktier i en kapitalförsäkring.

Om du har ett företag som handlar med värdepapper – både lokalt och globalt – måste du ha en LEI-kod. Antalet eller värdet på värdepapperna har ingen betydelse.

Orsaken till LEI-koder

LEI-kodsystemet skapades på grund av en begäran från G20-länderna i syfte att stärka den globala tillsynen av finansmarknaderna. LEI inrättades som ett gemensamt standard- och referenssystem som innehåller data för att säkerställa att finansiella transaktioner kan spåras globalt.

Ett LEI-nummer består av två datanivåer

• Nivå 1: Vem är vem?
Information som personens juridiska namn, registreringsnummer, juridisk adress och m.m.

• Nivå 2: Vem äger vem?
Relevant information relaterad till företagets ägare och ägarstruktur.

För vilka enheter finns det krav på LEI-kod?

Av Legal Entity (Efter ISO 17442), inkluderar begreppet, men begränsat inte till, unika identifierbara parters som antingen är juridiskt eller ekonomiskt ansvariga för finansiella transaktioner, eller har laglig rätt (i jurisdiktion) att teckna juridiska avtal oberoende av varandra. Detta oavsett om de kan införlivas eller bildas på något annat sätt (t.ex. trusts). Det inkluderar inte individuella personer, men inkluderar överstatliga- och statliga organisationer.

Ett lagligt krav för att få ett LEI regleras av nationella finansiella tillsynsmyndigheter. Du kan se en lista över reglerings initiativen som rör LEI-antagande här.

Har banken rätt till att kräva att du skaffar en LEI-kod?

Vem behöver LEI nummer? Enligt de nuvarande EU regleringarna, behöver banker och liknande institutioner rapportera partners som tar del av finansiella transaktioner. Därför kan banken kräva att du skaffar ett LEI om du vill handla.

När behövs en LEI-kod?

När behövs LEI kod? Alla juridiska personer legal entities som har MiFID II och som vill genomföra finansiella transaktioner med finansiella instrument (såsom fonder, obligationer, swaps, terminsaffärer etc.), för att göra detta behövs ett LEI nummer. De flesta banker eller värdepappersföretag tillåter dig inte att handla utan ett LEI.

Hur får jag en Legal Entity Identifier (LEI) för en fond eller välgörenhet som saknar organisationsnummer?

Vi kan också hjälpa dig med Legal Entity Identifier Sverige för en fond eller välgörenhet. Det är även obligatoriskt att skaffa ett LEI nummer för fonder och välgörenhet. Vänligen kontakta oss på info@leiservice.se och vi kommer då hjälpa dig med en smidig och enkel LEI nummer applikation för din fond eller välgörenhet, eller i andra fall om du inte har ett organisationsnummer.

Billigaste LEI-koden

När det kommer till tjänster som inte ger något mervärde oavsett hos vilken leverantör de inhandlas så här betalar man gärna så lite som möjligt. Därför har vi kikat på några olika leverantörer av LEI-kod och sammanställt prisnivåerna för nyteckning av LEI.

I det fall de skiljer sig har vi även i parentes skrivit med priserna som gäller ifall du väljer att förnya/förlänga en befintlig LEI via någon av tjänsterna. Samtliga priser är angivna exklusive moms.

Skaffa LEI-kod här

LeverantörPris kr/år vid köp 1årPris kr/år vid köp 3årPris kr/år vid köp 5år
leiservice.se695kr595kr485kr
swedlei.se680kr565kr490kr
sverigelei.se890kr (690kr)650kr (590kr)580kr (540kr)
unilei.com695kr598kr519kr
nordlei.org999kr (799kr)735kr (665kr)679kr (639kr)

Fortsätt läsa

Nyheter

BSE9 ETF bara företagsobligationer med förfall 2029

Publicerad

den

Invesco BulletShares 2029 EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF EUR Acc (BSE9 ETF) med ISIN IE000P5IB8I8, försöker följa Bloomberg 2029 Maturity EUR Corporate Bond Screened-index. Bloomberg 2029 Maturity EUR Corporate Bond Screened Index spårar företagsobligationer denominerade i EUR. Indexet speglar inte ett konstant löptidsintervall (som är fallet med de flesta andra obligationsindex). Istället ingår endast obligationer som förfaller under det angivna året (här: 2029) i indexet. Indexet består av ESG (environmental, social and governance) screenade företagsobligationer. Betyg: Investment Grade. Löptid: december 2029 (Denna ETF kommer att stängas efteråt).

Invesco BulletShares 2029 EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF EUR Acc (BSE9 ETF) med ISIN IE000P5IB8I8, försöker följa Bloomberg 2029 Maturity EUR Corporate Bond Screened-index. Bloomberg 2029 Maturity EUR Corporate Bond Screened Index spårar företagsobligationer denominerade i EUR. Indexet speglar inte ett konstant löptidsintervall (som är fallet med de flesta andra obligationsindex). Istället ingår endast obligationer som förfaller under det angivna året (här: 2029) i indexet. Indexet består av ESG (environmental, social and governance) screenade företagsobligationer. Betyg: Investment Grade. Löptid: december 2029 (Denna ETF kommer att stängas efteråt).

Den börshandlade fondens TER (total cost ratio) uppgår till 0,10 % p.a. Invesco BulletShares 2029 EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF EUR Acc är den billigaste och största ETF som följer Bloomberg 2029 Maturity EUR Corporate Bond Screened index. ETFen replikerar det underliggande indexets prestanda genom samplingsteknik (köper ett urval av de mest relevanta indexbeståndsdelarna). Ränteintäkterna (kupongerna) ackumuleras och återinvesteras.

Invesco BulletShares 2029 EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF EUR Acc är en mycket liten ETF med tillgångar på 6 miljoner euro under förvaltning. Denna ETF lanserades den 18 juni 2024 och har sin hemvist i Irland.

Produktbeskrivning

Invesco BulletShares 2029 EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Acc syftar till att tillhandahålla den totala avkastningen för Bloomberg 2029 Maturity EUR Corporate Bond Screened Index (”Referensindexet”), minus avgifternas inverkan. Fonden har en fast löptid och kommer att upphöra på Förfallodagen.

Referensindexet är utformat för att återspegla resultatet för EUR-denominerade, investeringsklassade, fast ränta, skattepliktiga skuldebrev emitterade av företagsemittenter. För att vara kvalificerade för inkludering måste företagsvärdepapper ha minst 300 miljoner euro i nominellt utestående belopp och en effektiv löptid på eller mellan 1 januari 2029 och 31 december 2029.

Värdepapper är uteslutna om emittenter: 1) är inblandade i kontroversiella vapen, handeldvapen, militära kontrakt, oljesand, termiskt kol eller tobak; 2) inte har en kontroversnivå enligt definitionen av Sustainalytics eller har en Sustainalytics-kontroversnivå högre än 4; 3) anses inte följa principerna i FN:s Global Compact; eller 4) kommer från tillväxtmarknader.

Portföljförvaltarna strävar efter att uppnå fondens mål genom att tillämpa en urvalsstrategi, som inkluderar användning av kvantitativ analys, för att välja en andel av värdepapperen från referensindexet som representerar hela indexets egenskaper, med hjälp av faktorer som index- vägd genomsnittlig varaktighet, industrisektorer, landvikter och kreditkvalitet. När en företagsobligation som innehas av fonden når förfallodag kommer kontanterna som fonden tar emot att användas för att investera i kortfristiga EUR-denominerade skulder.

ETFen förvaltas passivt.

En investering i denna fond är ett förvärv av andelar i en passivt förvaltad indexföljande fond snarare än i de underliggande tillgångarna som ägs av fonden.

Förfallodag: den andra onsdagen i december 2029 eller sådant annat datum som bestäms av styrelseledamöterna och meddelas aktieägarna.

Handla BSE9 ETF

Invesco BulletShares 2029 EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF EUR Acc (BSE9 ETF) är en europeisk börshandlad fond. Denna fond handlas på flera olika börser, till exempel Deutsche Boerse Xetra.

Det betyder att det går att handla andelar i denna ETF genom de flesta svenska banker och Internetmäklare, till exempel DEGIRONordnet, Aktieinvest och Avanza.

Börsnoteringar

BörsValutaKortnamn
XETRAEURBSE9

Största innehav

NamnCUSIPISINKupongräntaVikt %
AT&T Inc 2.35% 05/09/2900206RHH8XS19071207912,3502,22%
Holcim Finance Luxembourg SA 1.75% 29/08/29L4806FAH4XS16721514921,7502,14%
Unibail-Rodamco-Westfield SE 1.5% 29/05/29F95094ST0XS16195683031,5002,08%
Baxter International Inc 1.3% 15/05/29XS19982155591,3002,08%
Euronext NV 1.125% 12/06/29N3113KAT5XS20099433791,1252,06%
Blackstone Property Partners Europ 1.75% 12/03/29L1051PAD9XS20516703001,7502,04%
Walmart Inc 4.875% 21/09/29U9311FAG3XS04531339504,8751,72%
Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria SA 4.375% 14/10/29E118054J9XS25452061664,3751,65%
Toyota Motor Credit Corp 4.05% 13/09/29U89233WV5XS25970930094,0501,63%
Nykredit Realkredit AS 4.625% 19/01/29K74493TG0DK00305124214,6251,62%

Innehav kan komma att förändras

Fortsätt läsa

Nyheter

Crypto’s political tailwinds are blowing hard: Lessons from a week in Washington

Publicerad

den

Last week, I was in Washington, DC to attend the DC Blockchain Summit and to meet with regulators and policymakers to share our experiences as a crypto-focused asset manager over the last seven years.

Last week, I was in Washington, DC to attend the DC Blockchain Summit and to meet with regulators and policymakers to share our experiences as a crypto-focused asset manager over the last seven years.

The Summit, hosted by The Digital Chamber, included speeches from dozens of members of Congress, regulators, and industry leaders. After listening to presentations and speaking with a number of regulators and policymakers I have one key takeaway: Regulatory clarity for crypto will come much faster than I previously anticipated.

A dramatic shift in tone

As I wrote in January, US policymakers and government leaders—at nearly every level—are embracing this technology. For years, the lack of clear rules for digital assets in the US has been a major obstacle for institutional investors and financial firms looking to enter the crypto space. However, this past week in DC, as well as several of the conversations I’ve had with advisors and wealth managers over the last several weeks, has left me with an even higher sense of optimism.

One of the most striking takeaways from my meetings was the shift in how policymakers are discussing crypto. Just a year ago, many in Washington viewed digital assets primarily through the lens of risk—concerns over fraud, illicit finance, and speculative volatility dominated the conversation. While these concerns still exist, the discussions now are much more nuanced and focused on the opportunities that crypto can create to the American economy and how to address these risks through a clear regulatory framework.

Bipartisan support for legislation

Perhaps the most encouraging sign is the concrete progress being made on both legislative and regulatory fronts. Several key developments indicate that clearer guidelines for crypto businesses and investors could arrive sooner than expected. There is growing bipartisan momentum behind crypto-related legislation. The House Financial Services Committee and the Senate Banking Committee are moving forward with stablecoin legislation, and it is possible legislation could be signed into law as early as this summer. Stablecoins have also been a key focus of regulatory discussions, with growing consensus that they should be subject to clear guidelines similar to those governing payment systems and money market funds.

House and Senate committees are also actively discussing proposals that aim to define the jurisdiction of regulatory agencies, clarify the status of digital assets, and establish consumer protections. Unlike previous years, these efforts are being taken seriously by both parties, increasing the likelihood of meaningful legislative progress.

Adding to these regulatory discussions is the growing demand for crypto exposure from institutional investors. This demand is influencing policymakers and regulators, as they recognize that a lack of clarity is pushing innovation overseas.

What does this shift mean for investors?

The acceleration of regulatory clarity is a significant development for investors. While the approval of spot bitcoin ETFs last year was a watershed moment, it’s just the beginning. Several large financial institutions, including major banks and asset managers, are actively exploring tokenization, digital asset custody, and blockchain-based financial infrastructure. These institutions are engaging with regulators, advocating for a clear framework that allows them to enter the market with confidence.

Uncertainty has been one of the biggest barriers to broader crypto adoption by financial institutions and institutional investors in particular. As regulations become clearer this year, we expect to see:

• Increased institutional participation: With regulatory uncertainty diminishing, more traditional financial institutions will feel comfortable offering crypto products and using crypto technologies such as stablecoins to offer more efficient services, driving further mainstream adoption.

Growth in tokenization and blockchain use cases: Clearer regulations will pave the way for asset tokenization, improving efficiency in markets like real estate, bonds, and private equity.

• A stronger US crypto market: By establishing a clear regulatory framework, the US can assert itself as a global financial leader, which we believe will help spur more regulatory clarity in other jurisdictions.

Final thoughts

The message from Washington is clear: crypto regulation is coming, and it’s coming faster than many expected. While there are still hurdles to overcome, the shift from uncertainty to structured regulation is well underway. For investors, this marks an important transition. Clearer rules will reduce risks, enhance market stability, and unlock new opportunities for institutional and retail participants alike.

At Hashdex, we remain committed to navigating these changes and providing investors with access to the best opportunities in this evolving landscape. As we move forward, continued engagement with regulators, policymakers, and financial institutions will be key. The crypto industry has a critical role to play in shaping the future of regulation, and by working collaboratively, we can help ensure that the next phase of crypto’s growth is built on a foundation of clarity and trust.


Fortsätt läsa

21Shares

Prenumerera på nyheter om ETFer

* indicates required

21Shares

Populära