Nyheter
Stablecoin Synergy: Bridging Traditional and Decentralized Finance
Publicerad
3 månader sedanden
Stablecoins have swiftly become the backbone of the crypto world, driving 50% of all on-chain activity. Bridging the gap between volatile cryptoassets and fiat, they provide stability and a trusted medium for transactions. Seamlessly integrated into platforms like Stripe and PayPal, they empower users to engage with crypto without technical know-how. With fast, low-cost payments, stablecoins are revolutionizing remittances and cross-border transactions, especially in regions facing currency challenges, like 70% of the African continent. Their unique appeal to crypto veterans and newcomers fuels widespread adoption, positioning them as a key driver in the evolution of finance.
What Are Stablecoins?
Stablecoins are cryptoassets designed to maintain a stable value, usually pegged 1:1 to a commodity like gold or a fiat currency like the dollar. This design makes them ideal for everyday transactions and remittances.
• Fiat-collateralized: backed by fiat currencies, they represent the wholesome of this segment’s adoption. (Examples: Tether’s USDT and Circle’s USDC)
• Crypto-collateralized: backed by crypto, and to account for their volatility, they are often overcollateralized. (Example: MakerDAO’s DAI)
• Algorithmic: backed by algorithms and smart contracts to maintain their peg without any reserves. Instead, the peg is maintained by programmed mint and burn mechanisms. (Example: Aave’s GHO)
How Do Stablecoins Collateralize Their Assets?
Stablecoins maintain a peg through specific collateralization strategies and market mechanisms designed to defend against price fluctuations.
Fiat-Collateralized Stablecoins
USDT and USDC are issued by centralized entities like Tether and Circle and are backed mostly by fiat reserves held in off-chain bank accounts. Tether invests around 15% of its reserves in assets like Bitcoin and secured loans to drive revenue while keeping most of its holdings in cash or equivalents to ensure it can meet redemptions, as outlined in its Transparency Report.
• Operates on a 1:1 model, where each token is backed by an equivalent amount of fiat or cash equivalent (e.g., 1 USDC = $1).
• Issuers can liquidate reserves when needed, ensuring sufficient collateral to cover all outstanding tokens and maintain stability.
• Their straightforward design makes them highly efficient for trading and as collateral in DeFi, where liquidity is essential.
Thanks to their simplicity and reliability, fiat-backed stablecoins dominate the market—USDT and USDC alone boast over $140B, controlling over 90% of the market, as shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1 – Dominance of Fiat-Collateralized Stablecoins
Source: TokenTerminal, 21Shares
Crypto-Collateralized Stablecoins
Often operating without centralized oversight, they rely on smart contracts and cryptoassets as collateral to maintain stability.
• Typically, over-collateralized means users must lock up more value in crypto than the stablecoins they mint, creating a buffer to ensure stability even in volatile markets.
• If collateral falls below the threshold, users forfeit it to the protocol, protecting the peg. Price oracles automatically trigger liquidations to maintain solvency.
• While decentralized, this model requires a robust system of smart contracts. Interactions between smart contracts introduce technological risks that must be carefully managed to prevent potential failures.
A prime example is MakerDAO’s DAI, where users lock up ETH as over-collateralized debt. MakerDAO adjusts interest rates through on-chain governance, balancing supply and demand to maintain the peg. Due to its decentralized nature and internal management, DAI processed over $113B in inflows and outflows last month, as shown in Figure 2.
Figure 2 – Supply Inflow vs. Outflow due to DAI’s Decentralized Operations
Source: Artemis, 21Shares
Algorithmic Stablecoins
Aiming to maintain stability without using collateral, they rely instead on smart contracts and supply adjustments.
• Protocols like Ampleforth (AMPL) target a CPI-adjusted dollar by adjusting token supply based on price changes. If the price rises above the peg, the supply increases; if it falls below, the supply contracts through a process called rebasing.
• Some designs, like UST, used a second ”bond” token, LUNA, to expand and contract supply.
While innovative, these attempts have proven less reliable than collateral-backed models. Miscalculations or design flaws can lead to Black Swan events, as seen in the UST collapse.
So, How Are They Used?
- Trading / Exchange
Due to their stability, stablecoins have become integral to crypto trading, serving as both a store of value and a medium of exchange. Analyzing the two largest fiat-collateralized stables by market cap echoes this pattern. For USDC, approximately 60% of its supply resides in Externally Owned Accounts (EOAs), with 11% in Centralized Finance (CeFi) platforms, as demonstrated in Figure 3.
Figure 3 – USDC Utilization Across the Crypto Ecosystem
Source: Dune, 21Shares
USDT shows an even stronger trend, with 70% in EOAs and 25% in CeFi platforms, as depicted below. USDT is more popular, as Tether is quicker to deploy to lesser-known blockchains and integrate with a broader swath of centralized platforms.
Figure 4 – USDT Utilization Across the Crypto Ecosystem
Source: Dune, 21Shares
This distribution underscores stablecoins’ key value: providing stability. EOAs (non-custodial wallets like Metamask and Phantom) often serve as havens where users convert crypto to stable assets. CeFi platforms, including major exchanges like Binance and Coinbase, offer similar conversion options but also facilitate cross-border transactions. This is particularly relevant as they support USDT’s widespread presence on various networks, particularly Tron, which makes it a preferred choice for users in emerging economies across Latin America and Africa. This highlights stablecoins’ dual role in both investment preservation and global financial accessibility.
- DeFi
Fiat-collateralized stablecoins, like those from Circle and Tether, often have a limited presence in DeFi compared to decentralized alternatives such as Aave’s GHO or Maker’s DAI. This difference stems from the latter’s incentive strategies, which typically involve distributing native protocol tokens (e.g., AAVE or MKR) to boost adoption. PayPal’s PYUSD, however, stands out as an exception among centralized stablecoins.
In its push into the Solana ecosystem, PayPal partnered with Kamino Finance, offering yields of up to 17% annually on PYUSD deposits—significantly higher than competitors like USDC’s 9% on Solana. This approach initially proved successful, driving PYUSD’s market cap to nearly $1B, with almost 20% of its value distributed across decentralized exchanges (DEXs) as users leveraged it to generate yield by providing liquidity. Yet, when these incentives scaled back, the stablecoin’s market cap declined by almost 40% from the peak in August, highlighting the critical role of yield-driven strategies in shaping the adoption of stablecoin beyond the incumbents.
Figure 5 – PYUSD Utilization Across Crypto Ecosystem
Source: Dune, 21Shares
Similarly, GHO, Aave’s over-collateralized stablecoin, gained significant traction in DeFi, largely due to Aave’s strategic incentive structure. Notably, about 80% of GHO’s supply is utilized in lending, with another 5% distributed across DEXs. This distribution aligns with Aave’s strategy to position GHO at the core of its lending market, reinforcing the stablecoin’s role in the broader DeFi ecosystem and driving its adoption.
Figure 6 – GHO Utilization Across Crypto Ecosystem
Source: Dune, 21Shares
To recap, stablecoins’ general utilization makes up about 25% of DeFi, including DEXs, lending, and other types of financial engagement activities, as shown in Figure 7 below.
Figure 7 – Stablecoin Transaction Volume Classified by Type of Financial Activity
Source: Visa
- Remittance and Payments
As seen below, stablecoins offer a compelling cost advantage for cross-border payments compared to traditional international money transfer services, which charge an average of 6% per transaction.
Figure 8 – Average Remittance Cost by Funding Instrument (% of Transfer)
Source: Bloomberg, The World Bank and Coinbase
Transaction fees across blockchain networks vary significantly, ranging from fractions of a cent to several dollars—scalable blockchains like Solana, Fantom, Polygon, and TON offer average fees below one cent. In contrast, older-generation networks such as BNB, Tron, and Ethereum can incur fees from 10 cents to three dollars, as shown in Figure 9. However, Ethereum’s ecosystem has evolved with the introduction of Layer 2 solutions. Platforms like Base, Arbitrum, and Optimism, operating atop Ethereum, have now drastically reduced transaction costs to less than a cent, especially after the Dencun upgrade. This development has significantly enhanced Ethereum’s user cost efficiency.
Figure 9 – Average Transaction Fee of Leading Layer-1 Blockchains
Source: TokenTerminal, 21Shares
As seen, even with higher costs on networks like Ethereum, crypto transactions remain significantly cheaper than traditional payment systems. This cost-effectiveness is reflected in the unfazed growth of stablecoin usage, which has persisted through crypto’s cyclical nature over the past four years. Despite experiencing a bull market from Q3 2020 to late 2021, followed by a bear market from 2022 to Q3 2023, the number of stablecoin senders has continued to rise unabated. Remarkably, monthly stablecoin senders have surged by nearly 600%, as shown below, from approximately 2.3M in October 2020 to 12M today, underscoring the enduring appeal and utility of stablecoins beyond the confines of the crypto ecosystem.
Figure 10 – Monthly Number of Users Sending Stablecoins
Source: TokenTerminal, 21Shares
The evolving use of stablecoins is also evident in developing economies. A survey of 2,541 adults across Brazil, India, Indonesia, Nigeria, and Turkey, shows that 47% use stablecoins for better savings rates, 43% for improved currency conversion, and 37% to access dollars. Though limited in scope, this data suggests stablecoins are becoming versatile financial tools in emerging markets, addressing a range of economic needs beyond traditional crypto applications.
Figure 11 – Survey Inquiring “What are your primary goals when using stablecoins?”
Source: CastleIsland
Stablecoins’ Impact
Tether’s effect on the crypto ecosystem is substantial, with nearly 60M users onboarded, as illustrated in Figure 12. This figure represents over 27% of the industry’s total active user base of 220M – underscoring stablecoins significant role in driving crypto’s adoption.
Figure 12 – Total Amount of Stablecoin Holders
Source: TokenTerminal, 21Shares
USDT is particularly proving to be a crucial driver of network activity. With their current high usage rates, USDT alone paid over $7M in fees across its deployed blockchains on October 21 alone. This substantial fee contribution underscores the vital role stablecoins play in driving the growth of blockchain ecosystems.
In fact, USDT ranks as the third highest gas consumer on Ethereum over the past month, contributing over 5% (2.31K ETH) of the network’s total fees (40.27K ETH), highlighting stablecoins’ vital role in driving the network’s economic activity. On Tron, USDT accounted for 96% of network activity last week. This level of fee generation directly supports network security by compensating validators, underscoring stablecoins’ significant economic impact on blockchain networks.
Figure 13 – Daily Amount of Gas Fees by Stablecoin Issuer
Source: TokenTerminal, 21Shares
The Regulatory Landscape of Stablecoins
Stablecoin issuers are the 18th largest holder of U.S. debt, surpassing Germany and South Korea. As they become more widely adopted, their role could expand to include significant uses like purchasing national debt, further integrating them into the financial system. This growing influence highlights the need for clear regulations such as the Clarity for Payment Stablecoins and the Lummis-Gillibrand Payment Stablecoin Act, introduced last year to ensure security and trust in this evolving sector. As regulatory clarity is prolonged in the U.S., coupled with geopolitics and macro factors, the dominance of dollar-denominated stablecoins could start being overshadowed by inevitable worldwide adoption.
• Europe’s Markets in Crypto Assets (MiCA) Regulation is entering full force on December 30, 2024. The gradual enactment of MiCA started with its “Stablecoin Regime”, which went into effect in July, providing much-needed clarity over stablecoins. Issuers must have a MiCA license for publicly offering or trading asset-referenced tokens or e-money tokens within the European Union, without a transitional period. These restrictions on centralized issuers could lead stablecoins like USDT to be delisted from EU exchanges if Tether does not meet compliance by December 2024. Additionally, to protect its future monetary sovereignty, MiCA mandated some limits on the use of stablecoins pegged to foreign currencies, where issuance has to cease when the daily usage “as a means of exchange within a single currency area is higher than 1M transactions and €200M.”
• Thailand’s oldest bank is launching the island’s first stablecoin: Siam Commercial Bank (SCB), just partnered with fintech company Lightnet to launch Thailand’s first stablecoin for cross-border payments and remittances.
• The UAE’s Central Bank has granted in-principle approval to AED Stablecoin under its Payment Token Service Regulation framework. If fully approved, AED Stablecoin’s AE Coin could serve as a local trading pair for cryptocurrencies in exchanges and decentralized platforms while allowing merchants to accept it for goods and services. This regulatory development comes a few months after Tether announced its plans to launch an AED stablecoin, “creating an optionality towards the U.S. dollar,” as Tether’s CEO said at the time of the announcement.
Risks and Challenges
• Centralization: Fiat-backed stablecoins like USDT and USDC are issued by centralized entities, requiring users to trust custodians to maintain proper reserves. This centralization introduces counterparty risk, where inadequate collateralization could lead to liquidity issues that could ice users out. Additionally, centralization brings vulnerabilities such as regulatory intervention, mismanagement, or freezing of funds.
• Transparency: Essential for maintaining trust in fiat-backed stablecoins, as issuers hold their reserves off-chain, backed by cash or cash equivalents. To address this, issuers like Tether and Circle conduct regular audits, providing documentation of their reserves, as with Tether’s transparency reports, to ensure confidence in their solvency. Transparency is less of an issue for crypto-backed stablecoins since all assets are verifiable on-chain. These protocols often provide dashboards, such as MakerDAO’s DAI Stats Dashboard, which detail collateralization rates, total debt, collateral types, and loan stability.
• De-pegging events: When a stablecoin’s value significantly deviates from its intended peg. The most infamous de-pegging event involved the collapse of UST and LUNA in May 2022, which revealed severe risks tied to algorithmic stablecoins. As mentioned earlier, please check out our breakdown of this event here.
While stablecoins still experience de-pegs from time to time—they become more stable, as shown in Figure 14. This increased stability is driven by a growing influx of liquidity, a reflection of the industry’s maturation, and more battle-tested protocols. Stablecoins are now better equipped to withstand liquidity shocks, thanks to the large reserves built up by issuers or thriving on-chain communities that drive governance.
Figure 14 – Price Stability of Major Stablecoins
Source: Artemis, 21Shares
Why Now, and Where Do We Go From Here?
We’ve dedicated this report to stablecoins as we believe it’s timely considering the declining central bank interest rates, which will lead investors to chase higher yields. This has already begun to materialize with the total amount of loans on one of crypto’s unsecured lending platforms reaching an all-time high, as illustrated below.
Figure 15 – Total Outstanding Loans Value on Maple Finance
Source: Dune, 21Shares
That said, we believe the stablecoin market is poised for innovation, particularly in yield-generating models. The success of Ondo Finance’s USDY and Angle’s stEUR tokens, which utilize tokenized money market funds to provide daily dividends, is likely to inspire other issuers to adopt similar profit-sharing models. This trend aims to challenge established players like Tether and Circle, who currently retain profits from reinvesting user deposits into government securities. Emerging competitors are likely to leverage revenue-sharing mechanisms to capture market share, potentially reshaping the stablecoin ecosystem and offering users more lucrative alternatives such as Bitgo’s upcoming stablecoin. However, these innovative models may face regulatory scrutiny in the near term, as authorities work to establish clear frameworks that balance innovation with consumer protection and financial stability.
We also anticipate further innovation in delta-neutral strategies inspired by Ethena’s model. Despite unresolved issues around sustaining their strategy during market downturns, upcoming iterations will likely continue to leverage the maturing futures and options markets. The goal is to simplify these complex strategies, making them accessible to retail investors without requiring deep financial knowledge. This evolution aims to capitalize on the growing sophistication of crypto derivatives while democratizing access to advanced financial products.
Finally, we anticipate a potential shift in CBDC development. Central banks have varied motivations for exploring CBDCs, from enhancing financial inclusion to improving payment efficiency, but face complex design choices. Given the simplicity and proven effectiveness of fiat-backed stablecoins—which have facilitated nearly $35T in trading volume over the past decade—central banks may opt to integrate these solutions into traditional financial systems for now. As seen in Canada, Singapore, and the U.K., this pragmatic approach could serve as a temporary measure until consensus on optimal CBDC model designs is reached.
What’s happening this week?
Source: Forex Factory, 21Shares
Research Newsletter
Each week the 21Shares Research team will publish our data-driven insights into the crypto asset world through this newsletter. Please direct any comments, questions, and words of feedback to research@21shares.com
Disclaimer
The information provided does not constitute a prospectus or other offering material and does not contain or constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of any offer to buy securities in any jurisdiction. Some of the information published herein may contain forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned that any such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties and that actual results may differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements as a result of various factors. The information contained herein may not be considered as economic, legal, tax or other advice and users are cautioned to base investment decisions or other decisions solely on the content hereof.
Du kanske gillar
BNP Paribas Easy MSCI World ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF EUR Acc (ASRY ETF) med ISIN IE000W8HP9L8, försöker spåra MSCI World ESG Filtered Min TE-index. MSCI World ESG Filtered Min TE-index spårar stora och medelstora aktier från utvecklade marknader över hela världen. Aktierna som ingår är filtrerade enligt ESG (miljö, social och bolagsstyrning) och klimatförändringskriterier. Indexet syftar också till att minimera tracking error i förhållande till moderindexet (MSCI World).
Den börshandlade fondens TER (total cost ratio) uppgår till 0,15 % per år. BNP Paribas Easy MSCI World ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF EUR Acc är den billigaste och största ETF som följer MSCI World ESG Filtered Min TE-index. ETFen replikerar det underliggande indexets prestanda genom full replikering (köper alla indexbeståndsdelar). Utdelningarna i ETFen ackumuleras och återinvesteras
.
BNP Paribas Easy MSCI World ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF EUR Acc har tillgångar på 199 miljoner euro under förvaltning. Denna ETF lanserades den 6 oktober 2023 och har sin hemvist i Irland.
Handla ASRY ETF
BNP Paribas Easy MSCI World ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF EUR Acc (ASRY ETF) r en europeisk börshandlad fond. Denna fond handlas på flera olika börser, till exempel Deutsche Boerse Xetra och Euronext Paris.
Det betyder att det går att handla andelar i denna ETF genom de flesta svenska banker och Internetmäklare, till exempel DEGIRO, Nordnet, Aktieinvest, SAVR och Avanza.
Börsnoteringar
Ta bort komplexiteten med att äga en plånbok och satsa genom att lägga din ADA-token i en 100 % fysiskt backad Cardano, Cardano ADA Staking av Liqwid ETP (CSLE ETP), den mest decentraliserade Proof-of-Stake-blockkedjan. Den första produkten där investerare också deltar i tillväxten och säkerheten för Cardano-nätverket.
Produktinformation
Namn | Cardano ADA Staking by Liqwid |
Kortnamn | CASL/CSLE |
ISIN | CH1327686056 |
Underliggande tillgång | 100 procent Cardano |
Staking Reward Rate | 0,75% |
% Staked | 100 |
Valour | 132768605 |
Förvaltningsavgift | 1,5 % |
WKN | A4AFBK |
Replikering | Fysisk (fullständig säkerhet) |
Infrastruktur
Liqwid Finance
Liqwid är ett likviditetsprotokoll för utlåning och upplåning av Cardanos inhemska tillgångar. Liqwid-protokollet är sammansatt av decentraliserade, granskade smarta kontrakt byggda på Cardano blockchain.
Smarta kontrakt gör det möjligt för användare att sätta in likviditet på en penningmarknad, tjäna ränta och öppna översäkrade lån direkt, utan mellanhänder och på ett säkert sätt.
Plattformen lanserades i februari 2023 och har för närvarande över 70 miljoner dollar i tillgångar enligt sitt protokoll. Liqwids uppdrag är att bygga broar mellan decentraliserad och traditionell finans, med syftet att finansiera den reala ekonomin genom blockchain-teknik.
Handla CSLE ETP
Cardano ADA Staking by Liqwid ETP (CSLE ETP) är en europeisk börshandlad fond. Denna fond handlas på flera olika börser, till exempel Deutsche Boerse Xetra och SIX Swiss Exchange.
Det betyder att det går att handla andelar i denna ETF genom de flesta svenska banker och Internetmäklare, till exempel DEGIRO, Nordnet, Aktieinvest, SAVR och Avanza.
Börsnoteringar
Börs | Valuta | Kortnamn |
Xetra | EUR | CSLE |
SIX Swiss Exchange | USD | CASL |
SIX Swiss Exchange | CHF | CASL |
SIX Swiss Exchange | EUR | CASL |
Om du vill investera i fastigheter eller vill diversifiera din portfölj är REIT ETFer ett utmärkt sätt att få exponering mot de globala och europeiska fastighetsmarknaderna.
Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) är företag som direkt äger, driver eller finansierar inkomstbringande fastigheter. De fokuserar vanligtvis på kommersiella fastigheter som köpcentra, hotell, kontorsbyggnader etcetera snarare än bostäder, de kan handlas på börsen och de samlar investerarnas pengar i diversifierade innehav – se dem som motsvarigheten till fonder för fastigheter.
Hur fungerar REITs?
REITs är ett internationellt erkänt investeringsinstrument, som först etablerades i USA 1960, med målet att bredda deltagandet i fastigheter som en tillgångsklass. Storbritannien dök upp lite sent till spelet och antog REIT-lagstiftningen 2007. Kvalificeringskriterierna för REIT-status varierar beroende på territorium men generellt måste ett företag:
- Investera minst 75 % av sina tillgångar i fastigheter.
- Tjäna minst 75 % av vinsten från fastighetshyra, ränta på bolån eller från fastighetsförsäljningar.
- Betala ut minst 90 % av den skattepliktiga inkomsten som utdelning till aktieägarna.
- Högst 50 % av dess aktier får finnas hos 5 eller färre aktieägare.
- I Storbritannien måste fastighetsuthyrningen omfatta minst 3 fastigheter och ingen enskild fastighet får stå för mer än 40 % av densamma. I utbyte drar REITs nytta av en godartad skatteordning. Till exempel betalar inte brittiska REITs bolagsskatt eller kapitalvinstskatt på sina fastighetsinvesteringar, till skillnad från mindre effektiva, äldre fordon som fastighetsbolag och Property Unit Trusts. Som ett resultat har majoriteten av gamla fastighetsbolag i Storbritannien (efter värde) konverterat till REITs enligt British Property Federation.
Precis som med aktiefonder finns det olika typer av REIT. Vissa är stora med mycket diversifierade portföljer medan andra är specialiserade på en viss typ av fastigheter. Till exempel fokuserar vissa REIT på självförvaring, eller läkarmottagningar eller små affärsenheter. De flesta av REITs är kända som equity REITS och investerar direkt i deras fastigheter. Mortgage REITs tillhandahåller bolån till fastighetsägare eller köper inteckningsskyddade värdepapper (MBS), medan hybrid REITs blandar och matchar de två tillvägagångssätten.
Varför är REITs bättre än att investera i fastigheter direkt?
REITs kan noteras och handlas på aktiemarknaden precis som andra börshandlade värdepapper. Det gör REITs mycket likvida i jämförelse med enstaka fastigheter som kan ta lång tid att köpa eller sälja – vilket alla husägare kan vittna om. Illikviditet har ofta varit ett problem även för de börsnoterade fastighetsbolagens fordon. Deras struktur har tvingat vissa att begränsa inlösen under tider av stress och låsa in investerare eftersom företaget inte kunde avveckla sina innehav snabbt nog.
Som poolade investeringsinstrument har REITs den finansiella eldkraften att investera i flera fastigheter, medan små investerare tvingas placera alla sina satsningar på en enda fastighet på en enda marknad om de investerar direkt. Du kan också investera i en globalt diversifierad REIT ETF för 1 000 kronor i motsats till de miljoner du skulle behöva köpa in i ett enda, glänsande London-torn.
Dessutom behöver du inte bli expert på planering, finansiering, utveckling och underhåll av fastigheter när du kan lägga ut allt detta till en REITs ledningsgrupp.
Hur passar REITs in i min portfölj?
Genom att inkludera REITs i din tillgångsallokering kan du minska risken för din portfölj med hjälp av diversifiering.
REITs används också i stor utsträckning av investerare som är intresserade av hög direktavkastning. REIT-kravet att föra över 90 procent av vinsten som utdelning, plus det faktum att många tecknar hyresgäster på långtidshyresavtal, gör REITs till en användbar inkomstkälla.
Hur väljer jag REIT ETFer?
REIT ETFer erbjuder samma fördelar som andra typer av ETFer: ett enkelt, transparent, prisvärt sätt att investera i en handelbar korg med värdepapper.
REIT ETFer spårar REIT-aktieindex så att du kan dra nytta av avkastningen på hela fastighetsmarknader istället för att satsa gården på ett fåtal fastighetsbolag. Dessutom har internationellt erkännande av REIT:er möjliggjort utvecklingen av billiga globala fastighets-ETFer.
Om du föredrar internationell exponering och potential för starkare avkastning, titta på FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Dividend+ Index.
Om du är säker på de långsiktiga utsikterna för den brittiska marknaden, undersök då FTSE EPRA/NAREIT United Kingdom Index.
Naturligtvis är det viktigt att undersöka sammansättningen av de index som spåras av dina kortlistade ETF:er.
De 10 största fastighets-ETF:erna på marknaden
Tabellen nedan tar upp tio av de största fastighets-ETFerna som är tillgängliga för europeiska investerare som vill investera i fastigheter med hjälp av en börshandlad fond.
För ytterligare information om respektive börshandlad fond, klicka på kortnamnet i tabellen nedan.
Namn | Kortnamn | Valuta | Avgift, % |
iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF | IQQ6 | USD | 0.59% |
iShares European Property Yield UCITS ETF | IQQP | EUR | 0.40% |
iShares UK Property UCITS ETF | IUKP | GBP | 0.40% |
iShares US Property Yield UCITS ETF | IQQ7 | USD | 0.40% |
Xtrackers FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Europe Real Estate UCITS ETF 1C | D5BK | EUR | 0.33% |
iShares Asia Property Yield UCITS ETF | IQQ4 | USD | 0.59% |
Amundi ETF FTSE EPRA NAREIT Global UCITS ETF DR | EPRA | EUR | 0.24% |
SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF | SPYJ | USD | 0.40% |
HSBC FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF USD | H4ZL | USD | 0.40% |
VanEck Vectors Global Real Estate UCITS ETF | TRET | GBP | 0.25% |
ASRY ETF köper aktier från hela världen
CSLE ETP – Cardano plus staking rewards
Tio ETFer för att investera i fastigheter
ESGW ETF spårar de största företagen över hela världen
Enkelt & billigt – så fungerar SAVRs courtage
De mest eftersökta ETFerna i december 2024
Post-election rally cools at year end
De bästa ETFerna för värdeaktier
BlackRock slår rekord med lanseringen av bitcoin ETF
Hector McNeil kommenterar Trumps krav på Natos försvarsutgifter
Populära
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedan
De mest eftersökta ETFerna i december 2024
-
Nyheter3 veckor sedan
Post-election rally cools at year end
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedan
De bästa ETFerna för värdeaktier
-
Nyheter3 veckor sedan
BlackRock slår rekord med lanseringen av bitcoin ETF
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedan
Hector McNeil kommenterar Trumps krav på Natos försvarsutgifter
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedan
Buffertstrategin på Nasdaq-100 med december 2024/2025 som ny målperiod
-
Nyheter2 veckor sedan
HANetfs Tom Bailey om utsikterna för koppar och uran
-
Nyheter1 vecka sedan
Hur obligationer kan innebära långsiktig vinst