• Heightened User Activity, Soaring Transaction Fees, While Miners Sell Less
• Runes Protocol and Bitcoin’s Ever-Growing Ecosystem
Navigating Macro Headwinds, On-Chain Optics, and The Rise of Runes
This newsletter will be a Bitcoin-centric edition as we dissect the impact of recent macroeconomic events on Bitcoin’s price, followed up with an on-chain analysis of the network’s behavior post-halving. Additionally, we’ll explore some of the exciting innovations emerging within the Bitcoin ecosystem that were timed following the latest halving.
Bitcoin Weathers Macroeconomic Storm
The past two weeks have presented a challenging market environment for the crypto industry. As mentioned in our last newsletter, rising inflation in the U.S. remains, as evidenced by the higher-than-expected CPI print on April 9. Additionally, escalating conflict in the Middle East poses a significant threat to regional stability and added stress on the U.S. The potential of wider involvement from additional militant groups such as Lebanon’s Hezbollah, coupled with Iran’s control of a crucial maritime passage for commodity trading, the Strait of Hormuz, raise concerns about potential energy price hikes, steepening inflationary pressures and their effect on various asset classes.
Bitcoin initially reacted negatively to these events, experiencing an 8.22% drop in the immediate aftermath. Despite the 24/7 nature of crypto markets, which could have amplified the initial price shocks, Bitcoin’s underlying resilience shines through upon closer inspection. The S&P 500 fell by 2.03% on the market reopening last Monday and continues to tumble, while Bitcoin has recovered over 3.28% since the drawdowns, evidenced in Figure 1. This suggests a potentially more robust response to geopolitical turmoil compared to traditional assets, which is unsurprising given Bitcoin’s narrative as a flight to safety.
Figure 1: Bitcoin vs. Gold Price Performance Amid Geopolitical Tension
Source: TradingView
Examining Bitcoin’s market data, we see clear evidence that the futures market played a significant role in the initial price drops, which were attributed to the macroeconomic events of the last few weeks. A significant spike in long liquidations on the day of the attack, at $168M, suggests that some leveraged traders exited their positions, as shown below in Figure 2. Additionally, the high open interest at $35B leading up to the CPI print was followed by a recent $5B cool-off, indicating a correction in the futures market, reflected in the consolidation of the Bitcoin price.
Figure 2: Bitcoin Futures Long Liquidations, Short-Term and Long-Term Holder Supply
Source: Glassnode
Importantly, the spot market paints a more optimistic picture. In the last 10 days, which includes last week’s turbulence, long-term holders displayed minimal selling activity. Their holdings decreased by only 0.05%, while short-term holders continued to accumulate BTC, increasing their holdings by 0.5%. Notably, “Accumulation Addresses,” characterized by having no outbound transactions, holding more than 10 BTC, and not being affiliated with centralized exchanges or miners, have capitalized on the recent market dip. They currently hold over 3.17M BTC, accumulating over $2.3B since the CPI print, as evidenced below by Figure 3.
Figure 3 – Total Balance in Accumulation Addresses
Source: Glassnode
Further bolstering the positive outlook, the 90-day due diligence period for U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs has now concluded. According to Bloomberg, over 100 fund managers have disclosed their ownership of these products, signifying the growing institutional appetite for Bitcoin exposure, adding another layer of support to the asset class.
Heightened Activity, Soaring Transaction Fees, While Miners Sell Less
In the world of Bitcoin, transactions get logged onto a whiteboard-like structure, divided into cells called “blockspace,” where each cell represents a limited amount of space. Transaction fees play a crucial role in managing limited block space on the Bitcoin network. Users who pay higher fees get their transactions prioritized for confirmation within these blocks. This ensures smoother operation by preventing congestion and disincentivizing low-value spam transactions. Additionally, transaction fees serve as an important security measure. They incentivize miners to dedicate significant computing power to validate transactions and secure the network. Without these fees, mining might become less profitable, potentially jeopardizing network security.
Finally, transaction fees are at the core of Bitcoin’s economic sustainability as the mining reward gets halved every 210,000 blocks, transaction fees step up to fill the gap and pump miners’ revenue. We can already see the early innings of transaction fees rising against the issuance or block rewards since the launch of Ordinals in 2023, as shown in the chart below.
Figure 4 – Bitcoin Miners Revenue Breakdown
Source: 21co on Dune
It is no surprise that Bitcoin network activity has been high this year, with the amount of active addresses hovering between 700K and 1 million since January, up until the halving event. On-chain data reveals a lower-than-expected drop in active addresses following the halving, with transaction fees reaching new highs. While active addresses did experience a significant drop (43%) on April 19, falling from over 893K to 500K, they have already recovered 70K since then. Historically, the halving typically leads to a smaller decrease in active addresses (3-9%). This larger drop could indicate that rising fees are pricing some users out of the market for now, but as we’ll cover later, there are certain solutions being worked on to help alleviate this issue.
That said, transaction fees soared up to $128 on April 20, breaking $78M, tripling the previous all-time high, and making up 75% of Bitcoin miner revenue, as shown in Figure 4. The spike was primarily due to Ordinal-like inscriptions which have recently seen a spike thanks to Runes protocol, which we’ll delve deeper into in the last section. In line with this, the burgeoning Bitcoin ecosystem, expedited by Rune, has not only pushed Bitcoin out of its comfort zone unlocking new use cases, but also its transaction fees to surpass Ethereum’s since May 2023, as seen in Figure 5.
Figure 5 – BTC vs ETH fees (2 Years)
Source: Glassnode
The growth in transaction fees is appreciated even further, especially when we examine miner behavior following the halving event. Miners are now less motivated to immediately liquidate their freshly acquired BTC, as they can capitalize on an additional revenue stream apart from block rewards.
Let’s zoom in on miner activity after the halving. About 50 BTC were sold on centralized exchanges on April 20, which doesn’t compare to the sell-off of March 5 when approximately 1,154 BTC were sent to exchanges, pulling the asset to ~$64K, down from ~$68K, as shown in the chart below. The recent sale also doesn’t compare to the 307 BTC sold on the day following the previous halving in May 2020, when the asset was trading just below $9K.
Figure 6 – Transfer Volume from Bitcoin Miners to Exchanges in BTC (YTD)
Source: Glassnode
The rising importance of Ordinal inscription, akin to non fungible tokens (NFTs), can be seen with Bitcoin generating $475M in real NFT sales versus Ethereum, which helps miners rake in more revenue and become sustainable. That said, the growing adoption of the Runes protocol is expected to drive even more activity toward the miners over the coming months.
Runes Protocol and Bitcoin’s Evergrowing Ecosystem
To recap, Runes streamlines the creation and management of fungible tokens on top of Bitcoin. It addresses the inefficiencies of the BRC20 standard, which have burdened the Bitcoin blockchain due to its inefficient data handling approach. That said, Runes achieves this in two key ways. Firstly, it optimizes transaction fees by consolidating multiple Unspent Transaction Output (UTXO) transactions into one bundle, leveraging Bitcoin’s accounting UTXO model. Additionally, it utilizes Bitcoin’s script, OP_Return, to inscribe data directly onto the blockchain, which serves to assign and transfer Runes balances within the network’s UTXOs. By minimizing data usage to 80 bytes, compared to BRC20’s 4MB, Runes prevents unnecessary bloat on the Bitcoin blockchain.
Ultimately, Runes presents an innovation aimed at bolstering Bitcoin’s security budget, offering miners an alternative revenue source to reduce their dependence on Bitcoin’s subsidized rewards over the long term. In fact, miners have earned about 1,500 BTC, valued at close to $100M in less than three days of trading activity, as seen below in Figure 7. To that end, Runes has garnered widespread support from the outset, with multiple Tier 2 exchanges such as OKX and Gate.io already announcing the listing of early collections like UNCOMMON.GOODS and MEME.ECONOMICS, which were among the first collections minted. Additionally, Binance appears to be hinting at support for meme tokens like Wizard and Pups, which were also among the first tokens to migrate from the BRC20 to the Runes standard. Meanwhile, NFT platforms like Magic Eden and Bitcoin-focused wallet provider Unisat are also joining the trend to capitalize on Runes’ growing popularity.
Figure 7: Fees Paid by Users to Mint Tokens Using the New Runes Protocol
Source: CryptoKoryo on Dune
Following the pattern of past hype cycles, we anticipate that the initial excitement surrounding Runes will gradually subside, followed by a surge of heightened activity in the long run. This trend is often observed because the initial wave of interest tends to be on meme tokens, which can be quickly deployed and attract the masses’ attention, but often don’t add substantial value. However, as time progresses, sophisticated primitives like exchanges, automated market makers, and other DeFi lego blocks will begin emerging. These advancements will bolster Bitcoin’s capabilities at the application layer, streamlining the process of token trading on the Bitcoin network, much like ERC20/ERC721 did for Ethereum. In fact, when considering Bitcoin’s untapped market potential to establish its own fungible market ecosystem compared to other smart contract platforms, it becomes evident that there is substantial room for growth for this new generation of tokens, as illustrated in Figure 8 below.
Figure 8: The Market Opportunity for Bitcoin’s Fungible Tokens Ecosystem
Source: FranklinTempleton
That said, Ordinals and Runes aren’t the only source of excitement pushing the boundaries of Bitcoin. For one, Bitcoin’s scaling solution Stacks began the first phase of its Nakamoto upgrade, called the instantiation stage, on April 22, while its final phase is expected to culminate by the end of May. As part of the upgrade, Stacks will introduce faster block processing times, enabling transactions to be finalized in under 5 seconds, a significant improvement from Bitcoin’s average of 10-30 minutes. Additionally, Stacks will leverage Bitcoin’s robust security guarantees, making transaction reversals on the Stacks network as challenging as those on the Bitcoin network. Furthermore, the upgrade will introduce a 1:1 BTC-backed asset (sBTC), enhancing the utility of Bitcoin by enabling its use across a diverse ecosystem of financial and gaming applications built on top of the scaling solution. The growing excitement surrounding its upgrade has pushed the total valued locked on the network to its highest point last week, reaching $170M.
On the other hand, there is a growing ecosystem of scaling solutions emerging on the back of BitVM, released last year. Standing for Bitcoin Virtual machine, this primitive is an operating system that allows for native smart-contract functionality on top of Bitcoin. It does so by introducing what’s known as a two-party provider verifier model that allows for complex computation to be executed off-chain, which can then be challenged on top of Bitcoin using fraud proofs, akin to how Arbitrum and Optimism function. To put it simply, BitVM enables Bitcoin to host more complex applications, which is giving birth to an embryonic L2 landscape, including Chainway, BitLayer, and Bob, amongst others, aiming to alleviate the issue of rising transaction costs. However, we will be closely monitoring this emerging sector, as there are numerous projects attempting to exploit the unprecedented enthusiasm for Bitcoin to launch potentially fraudulent protocols.
Each week the 21Shares Research team will publish our data-driven insights into the crypto asset world through this newsletter. Please direct any comments, questions, and words of feedback to research@21shares.com
Disclaimer
The information provided does not constitute a prospectus or other offering material and does not contain or constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of any offer to buy securities in any jurisdiction. Some of the information published herein may contain forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned that any such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties and that actual results may differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements as a result of various factors. The information contained herein may not be considered as economic, legal, tax or other advice and users are cautioned to base investment decisions or other decisions solely on the content hereof.
I denna text tittar vi närmare på olika börshandlade produkter som ger exponering mot AAVE. Precis som för många andra kryptovalutor och tokens finns det flera olika börshandlade produkter som spårar AAVE. Vi har identifierar fyra stycken sådana produkter.
De olika produkterna skiljer sig en del åt, en del av emittenter av ETPer arbetar med så kallad staking för vissa kryptovalutor, vilket gör att förvaltningsavgiften kan pressas ned. Det är emellertid inte så att alla dessa börshandlade produkter är identiska varför det är viktigt att läsa på.
Börshandlade produkter som ger exponering mot AAVE
Precis som för många andra kryptovalutor och tokens finns det flera olika börshandlade produkter som spårar AAVE. Det finns faktiskt en börshandlad produkt som är noterade på svenska börser vilket gör att den som vill handla med dessa slipper växlingsavgifterna, något som kan vara skönt om det gäller upprepade transaktioner i olika riktningar.
För ytterligare information om respektive ETP klicka på kortnamnet i tabellen nedan.
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Europe Socially Responsible UCITSETF (EUR) A-acc (UIW1 ETF) med ISIN LU2206597804, strävar efter att spåra MSCI Europe SRI Low Carbon Select 5% Issuer Capped-index. MSCI Europe SRI Low Carbon Select 5% Emittent Capped-index spårar värdepapper från Europa. Endast företag med mycket höga ESG-betyg (Environmental, Social and Governance) i förhållande till sina branschkollegor ingår. Vikten för varje företag är begränsad till 5 %.
Den börshandlade fondens TER (total cost ratio) uppgår till 0,18 % per år. UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Europe Socially Responsible UCITSETF (EUR) A-accär den billigaste och största ETFen som följer MSCI Europe SRI Low Carbon Select 5% Emittent Begränsat index. ETFen replikerar det underliggande indexets prestanda genom full replikering (köper alla indexbeståndsdelar). Utdelningarna i ETFen ackumuleras och återinvesteras.
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Europe Socially Responsible UCITSETF (EUR) A-acchar tillgångar på 142 miljoner euro under förvaltning. Denna ETF lanserades den 26 februari 2021 och har sin hemvist i Luxemburg.
Översikt
Investeringsmålet är att replikera pris- och avkastningsutvecklingen för MSCI Europe SRI Low Carbon Select 5 % Emittenttak med totalavkastning nettoindex netto efter avgifter.
Fonden investerar i allmänhet i aktier som ingår i MSCI Europe SRI Low Carbon Select 5% Issuer Capped Index. Bolagens relativa viktning motsvarar deras viktning i index.
Det betyder att det går att handla andelar i denna ETF genom de flesta svenska banker och Internetmäklare, till exempel DEGIRO, Nordnet, Aktieinvest, SAVR och Avanza.
Över hälften av investerarna anser fortfarande miljömässiga, sociala och styrande faktorer som mycket viktiga när det gäller allokering av portföljtillgångar.
Svårighet att mäta effekt ses som det största hindret för att fortsätta använda hållbara investeringar.
Juryn ut de bästa sätten att driva positiv förändring, med effektinvesteringar, exkluderande screening, individuellt företagsengagemang och statlig policy och reglering bland topplistan.
Fidelity International (Fidelity) avslöjar idag nyckelresultat från sin Professional Investor DNA Survey, som samarbetar med Crisil Coalition Greenwich för att söka åsikter från över 120 institutionella investerare och mellanhandsdistributörer över hela Europa och Asien, om investerares aptit för att införliva ESG (miljö, social och styrning). ) överväganden i portföljallokering.
Enligt studien anser över hälften av investerarna fortfarande ”E”, ”S” och ”G”-faktorer som viktiga när det kommer till portföljtillgångsallokering under de kommande 18 månaderna.
Miljö är den viktigaste faktorn, med två tredjedelar (63 %) av investerarna som betraktar det som en viktig faktor, med styrning (58 %) och social (51 %) som följer efter. I spetsen är europeiska och institutionella investerare som lägger mer vikt vid ESG-kriterier i portföljtillgångsallokeringen.
När man tittar på hållbarhetsteman avslöjar studien ytterligare investerarfokus på miljöhänsyn, med utsläpp av koldioxid och energiomställningen tillsammans med bevarandet av naturkapital rankas bland de tre främsta teman i fokus, troligtvis driven av pågående investerare och politiska beslutsfattares åtaganden att nå nettonollutsläpp. utsläppsmål.
Företagstransparens rankas på andra plats totalt sett, vilket underbygger investerarnas önskan om stark bolagsstyrning.
Svårighet att mäta påverkan största hindret för att investera hållbart
Även om ESG ses som viktigt vid tillgångsallokering finns det fortfarande hinder kvar. Svårighet att mäta effekten ses som det största hindret för att fortsätta använda hållbara investeringar (68 % totalt). Samtidigt nämnde 52 % av investerarna förändringar av eller inkonsekventa regler som en viktig barriär. I Asien ansåg 66 % av investerarna att bristen på utbud av kvalitetsstrategier/produkter var ett hinder – jämfört med endast 31 % i Europa.
Jenn-Hui Tan, Chief Sustainability Officer, Fidelity International kommenterar: ”Vår studie visar att ESG ligger fast i investerarnas sinnen. Även om ESG-investeringar nu kan ses som en vanlig övervägande i tillgångsallokering, krävs ytterligare framsteg för att bryta ned implementeringshinder. Detta inkluderar svåra mätningar av påverkan, med observationer som pekar på svårigheter att anskaffa och analysera företagsdata av god kvalitet, och att navigera i regelverk, där avvikelser kvarstår mellan nationella, europeiska och globala regelverk.
”Vi fortsätter att stödja ökad datatransparens och standardisering, och harmoniseringen av globala regulatoriska regimer som möjliggör beslutsanvändbar avslöjande. Vi kämpar också för ett större fokus på policyer som driver verkliga resultat, som kompletterar rollen av förbättrade avslöjanden när det gäller att vägleda investerares val.”
”I Asien visar vår studie att produkttillgängligheten fortsätter att släpa efter Europa. Ett viktigt fokusområde i Asien är övergångsfinansiering, som stöds av övergångsplaner på nationell nivå, såväl som innovativa ramverk och produktstrukturer. Vi förväntar oss att detta kommer att utlösa större produktinnovation, som svarar mot ökande efterfrågan från kunder.”
Hur man skapar positiv påverkan
När juryn tillfrågades om det mest effektiva sättet att skapa positiva effekter var juryn ute med investerare och nämnde ett antal olika sätt från effektinvesteringar (59 %), exkluderande screening (52 %), individuellt företagsengagemang (44 %) och statlig policy och reglering (44 %), vilket lyfter fram den multifaktorstrategi som behövs när det gäller att driva på förändring.
Jenn-Hui Tan, tillägger: ”Vi tror att integrationen av hållbarhet i investeringsanalys och portföljkonstruktion är viktig eftersom det kan påverka långsiktigt värdeskapande och leda till bättre kundresultat. Som en aktiv förvaltare och förvaltare av kundkapital har vi en del att spela för att gå mot en mer hållbar ekonomi som bättre tar hänsyn till risker på systemnivå, men som studien visar finns det inget sätt att uppnå detta. Det är därför vi tror att effektivt förvaltarskap kombinerar nedifrån och upp, tematiska och systemomfattande tillvägagångssätt.
”Att mäta och tillskriva påverkan fortsätter att vara en branschutmaning, men som en del av vårt engagemang för att driva meningsfull och mätbar förändring är vi i färd med att utveckla ett förbättrat ramverk för engagemang för att bättre mäta djupet och kvaliteten på våra engagemang mot specifika mål över tid. , vilket gör att vi kan gå mot ett mer resultatbaserat engagemang.”
Fidelity fortsätter att införliva ESG i sin investeringsportfölj, utvecklar ett robust ramverk för hållbara investeringar och bidrar aktivt till viktiga regelverk både på global och lokal nivå. Fidelity fokuserar på fyra systemiska teman: naturförlust, klimatförändringar, stark och effektiv styrning och sociala skillnader, för att vägleda dess aktiva engagemang.