Nyheter

A Tale of Two Oil Camps

Publicerad

9 år sedan

den

26 februari, 2016

Redaktionen

A Tale of Two Oil Camps by Shawn Reynolds, Portfolio ManagerHard Assets Investment Team

After attending a prominent industry conference and meeting with the management teams of a number of oil exploration and production (E&P) companies, Shawn Reynolds shares his observations on the general sentiment of market participants in the report A Tale of Two Oil Camps.

Early this year, I attended the Goldman Sachs Global Energy Conference in Miami, Florida. A great deal can happen in just a few weeks, but it still may be worth briefly giving some thoughts both on the conference and subsequent visits with a number of the leading E&P companies in Texas.

The Goldman conference is usually very well attended by nearly all constituents and can often provide a good barometer of trends, and perhaps most importantly, sentiment. Generally, in our view, there were two discrete camps among the attendees: the “haves” and the “have nots”.

At the conference, the haves were those who have been involved in the energy/natural resources space – whether short or long term – and have been burned. The have nots were those who have not been involved, and have not yet determined whether this is the right time, or not, to invest.

Among the haves, the sentiment was overwhelmingly negative, indeed more negative then I have ever seen in my over 30 years following the industry. These haves numbered not only investors, but also senior industry executives and investment bankers. On the other hand, the have nots, those who have not been invested or involved in the industry, are clearly very interested to know, and are doing their work to determine, whether now is the time to invest.

At the end of the day, however, both camps are, essentially, asking the same big questions: When does the cycle turn? And what is different this time?

The short and quick answer, and this was very clear from the meetings with the E&P companies throughout Texas the week following the conference, is that, at current prices, this industry, on a global basis, just does not work. It is not survivable. At these prices, it’s likely that almost every barrel of oil being produced in the world outside the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) is generating negative returns and many are cash negative. If we stay at these prices even for a couple more weeks, we are going to see a screeching halt to activity. And that, in and of itself, will start to help solve the current oversupply situation.

It was obvious from my discussions with them that the E&P companies, too, are split into two camps. Also haves and have nots, but of a different hue this time: the haves who have it to survive, the have nots who don’t, and may not. Unfortunately, there is a very small camp of haves, and a very large camp of have nots.

The haves are characterized by having acreage/assets in the best areas or the “core of the core”, being able to drill economically at these prices, and, more importantly, having had the very good foresight to fix their balance sheets, either by issuing equity, or restraining capital expenditure, or cutting back on operating expenses. Or, indeed, all three of these.

These are the companies that are expected to be able to survive and, maybe, even thrive through this period. The rest of the industry is going to continue to struggle and many are facing survivability. This will come to a head in the spring when we will see a lot of the banks start to go through a re-determination of the revolving lines they have out to certain oil companies.

People have been asking whether, on the mergers & acquistions (M&A) front, we’re now going to see the large integrated companies come swooping in and picking up all these smaller players. Very unlikely in our view. It is an exceptionally important issue to a major that any deal it does is accretive either to earnings or to cash flow, and most critically, not dilutive to dividends. With an E&P company trading at 24x earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) and 100x earnings, or even having negative earnings, with many having capital investment requirements exceeding cash flow, any such deal is not going to be accretive and may diminish the ability to maintain and grow dividends. While not unheard of, it is uncommon for the integrated majors to acquire an independent E&P company. Nevertheless, given the extremely weak reserve replacement record of most of the integrated majors (most less than 100%), potential targets for such a deal could be some of the U.S. unconventional shale oil players that have significant unbooked resource potential. However, this also highlights the degenerative state that many of the major oil producers of the world face, i.e. they are producing more oil than they are able to replace on an annual basis – a situation that ultimately puts them in the category of the have nots.

Please note that the information herein represents the opinion of VanEck and these opinions may change at any time and from time to time.

THIS MATERIAL MAY ONLY BE PROVIDED TO YOU BY VANECK AND IS FOR YOUR PERSONAL USE ONLY AND MUST NOT BE PASSED ON TO THIRD PARTIES WITHOUT THE PRIOR EXPRESS WRITTEN CONSENT OF VANECK. IF YOU HAVE NOT RECEIVED THIS MATERIAL FROM VANECK, YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT YOU HAVE RECEIVED IT FROM A NON-AUTHORIZED SOURCE THAT DID NOT ACT ON BEHALF OF VANECK AND THAT ANY REVIEW, USE, DISSEMINATION, DISCLOSURE, OR COPYING OF THIS MATERIAL IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED.

Information contained in this presentation is for information purposes only and should not be construed as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument, product, or service sponsored by VanEck or its affiliates. This material does not constitute an offer to sell or solicitation to buy any security, including shares of any fund. An offer or solicitation will be made only through the fund’s official offering document and will be subject to the terms and conditions contained therein.

Hard assets investments are subject to risks associated with natural resources and commodities and events related to these industries. Commodity investments may be subject to the risks associated with its investments in commodity-linked derivatives, risks of investing in a wholly owned subsidiary, risk of tracking error, risks of aggressive investment techniques, leverage risk, derivatives risks, counterparty risks, non-diversification risk, credit risk, concentration risk and market risk.

Please note that the information herein represents the opinion of the author, and these opinions may change at any time and from time to time, and portfolio managers of other investment strategies may take an opposite opinion than those stated herein. Not intended to be a forecast of future events, a guarantee of future results, or investment advice. Current market conditions may not continue.

The information herein reflects prevailing market conditions and our judgments as of the date of this document, which are subject to change. In preparing this document, we have relied upon and assumed, without independent verification, the accuracy and completeness of all information available from public sources. Opinions and estimates may be changed without notice and involve a number of assumptions that may not prove valid. There is no guarantee that any forecasts or opinions in this material will be realized. Past performance is not a guarantee or a reliable indicator of future results. All investments contain risk and may lose value. This information should not be construed as investment advice. This information should not be construed as sales or marketing material or an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument, product, or service sponsored by Van Eck Associates Corporation or its affiliates.

Van Eck Securities Corporation, Distributor, 666 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017, vaneck.com, 800.826.2333.

Liknande ämnen:VanEck

Nästa

Så här går börsen i dag 20160226

Missa inte

Nordiska ETFmarknaden januari 2016

Fortsätt läsa

Annons

Klicka för att kommentera

Nyheter

Michael Saylor’s bold Bitcoin bet and Strategy’s risk analysis

Publicerad

11 timmar sedan

den

1 april, 2025

Redaktionen

Michael Saylor’s bold Bitcoin bet and Strategy’s risk analysis
Bitcoin price technical analysis: Where are the liquidation levels?
What are real-world assets and why do we need tokenization?

Michael Saylor’s bold Bitcoin bet and Strategy’s risk analysis

Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy) has amassed a staggering $43 billion in Bitcoin, positioning itself at the forefront of the corporate “reserve race.” Under the leadership of Bitcoin maximalist Michael Saylor, the company now boasts an $84 billion market cap. But with such an aggressive strategy, how sustainable is its approach—and what risks lie ahead? We break it down in today’s analysis.

Bitcoin price technical analysis: Where are the liquidation levels?

A drop below $72,000 could flush longs, while a breakout above $90,000 may squeeze shorts. One key positive indicator is that Bitcoin continues to print higher lows since March 10, which preserves a bullish market structure in our view. Dive into our technical analysis.

What are real-world assets and why do we need tokenization?

Imagine owning a slice of a skyscraper or a piece of fine art with just a few clicks. Tokenization, the act of converting ownership rights to real-world assets (RWAs) into tradable tokens, has surpassed $10 billion in on-chain value, unlocking global 24/7 access to once-exclusive markets with liquidity, efficiency, and yield. Find out how it works.

Research Newsletter

Each week the 21Shares Research team will publish our data-driven insights into the crypto asset world through this newsletter. Please direct any comments, questions, and words of feedback to research@21shares.com

Disclaimer

The information provided does not constitute a prospectus or other offering material and does not contain or constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of any offer to buy securities in any jurisdiction. Some of the information published herein may contain forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned that any such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties and that actual results may differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements as a result of various factors. The information contained herein may not be considered as economic, legal, tax or other advice and users are cautioned to base investment decisions or other decisions solely on the content hereof.

Fortsätt läsa

Nyheter

BSE0 ETF köper bara företagsobligationer med förfall 2030

Publicerad

12 timmar sedan

den

1 april, 2025

Redaktionen

Invesco BulletShares 2030 EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF EUR Acc (BSE0 ETF) med ISIN IE000I25S1V5, försöker följa Bloomberg 2030 Maturity EUR Corporate Bond Screened-index. Bloomberg 2030 Maturity EUR Corporate Bond Screened Index följer företagsobligationer denominerade i EUR. Indexet speglar inte ett konstant löptidsintervall (som är fallet med de flesta andra obligationsindex). Istället ingår endast obligationer som förfaller under det angivna året (här: 2030) i indexet. Indexet består av ESG (environmental, social and governance) screenade företagsobligationer. Betyg: Investment Grade. Löptid: december 2030 (Denna ETF kommer att stängas efteråt).

Den börshandlade fondens TER (total cost ratio) uppgår till 0,10 % p.a. Invesco BulletShares 2030 EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF EUR Acc är den billigaste och största ETF som följer Bloomberg 2030 Maturity EUR Corporate Bond Screened index. ETFen replikerar det underliggande indexets prestanda genom samplingsteknik (köper ett urval av de mest relevanta indexbeståndsdelarna). Ränteintäkterna (kupongerna) ackumuleras och återinvesteras.

Invesco BulletShares 2030 EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF EUR Acc är en mycket liten ETF med tillgångar på 6 miljoner euro under förvaltning. Denna ETF lanserades den 18 juni 2024 och har sin hemvist i Irland.

Produktbeskrivning

Invesco BulletShares 2030 EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Acc syftar till att ge den totala avkastningen för Bloomberg 2030 Maturity EUR Corporate Bond Screened Index (”Referensindexet”), minus avgifternas inverkan. Fonden har en fast löptid och kommer att upphöra på Förfallodagen.

Referensindexet är utformat för att återspegla resultatet för EUR-denominerade, investeringsklassade, fast ränta, skattepliktiga skuldebrev emitterade av företagsemittenter. För att vara berättigade till inkludering måste företagsvärdepapper ha minst 300 miljoner euro i nominellt utestående belopp och en effektiv löptid på eller mellan 1 januari 2030 och 31 december 2030.

Värdepapper är uteslutna om emittenter: 1) är inblandade i kontroversiella vapen, handeldvapen, militära kontrakt, oljesand, termiskt kol eller tobak; 2) inte har en kontroversnivå enligt definitionen av Sustainalytics eller har en Sustainalytics-kontroversnivå högre än 4; 3) anses inte följa principerna i FN:s Global Compact; eller 4) kommer från tillväxtmarknader.

Portföljförvaltarna strävar efter att uppnå fondens mål genom att tillämpa en urvalsstrategi, som inkluderar användning av kvantitativ analys, för att välja en andel av värdepapperen från referensindexet som representerar hela indexets egenskaper, med hjälp av faktorer som index- vägd genomsnittlig varaktighet, industrisektorer, landvikter och kreditkvalitet. När en företagsobligation som innehas av fonden når förfallodag kommer kontanterna som fonden tar emot att användas för att investera i kortfristiga EUR-denominerade skulder.

ETFen förvaltas passivt.

En investering i denna fond är ett förvärv av andelar i en passivt förvaltad indexföljande fond snarare än i de underliggande tillgångarna som ägs av fonden.

”Förfallodag”: andra onsdagen i december 2026 eller sådant annat datum som bestäms av styrelseledamöterna och meddelas aktieägaren

Handla BSE0 ETF

Invesco BulletShares 2030 EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF EUR Acc (BSE0 ETF) är en europeisk börshandlad fond. Denna fond handlas på flera olika börser, till exempel Deutsche Boerse Xetra.

Det betyder att det går att handla andelar i denna ETF genom de flesta svenska banker och Internetmäklare, till exempel DEGIRO, Nordnet, Aktieinvest och Avanza.

Börsnoteringar

Börs	Valuta	Kortnamn
XETRA	EUR	BSE0

Största innehav

Namn	CUSIP	ISIN	Kupongränta	Vikt %
Fresenius SE & Co KGaA 5.125% 05/10/30	D2R9K1AL3	XS2698713695	5.125	2.55%
Mercedes-Benz Group AG 2.375% 22/05/30	D1668RZW0	DE000A289XG8	2.375	2.19%
Akzo Nobel NV 1.625% 14/04/30	N01803YV6	XS2156598281	1.625	2.08%
Eni SpA 0.625% 23/01/30	T3666JJV9	XS2107315470	0.625	1.98%
Prologis International Funding II 2.375% 14/11/30	L7763MAD2	XS1904690341	2.375	1.78%
REWE International Finance BV 4.875% 13/09/30	N74119AA1	XS2679898184	4.875	1.65%
CaixaBank SA 4.25% 06/09/30	E2R193R97	XS2676814499	4.250	1.64%
Verizon Communications Inc 4.25% 31/10/30	—	XS2550881143	4.250	1.64%
Liberty Mutual Group Inc 4.625% 02/12/30	U52932BR7	XS2561647368	4.625	1.62%
AXA SA 3.75% 12/10/30	F0609NBG2	XS2537251170	3.750	1.60%

Innehav kan komma att förändras

Fortsätt läsa

Nyheter

US regulatory shift provides a beacon for optimism

Publicerad

13 timmar sedan

den

1 april, 2025

Redaktionen

Since President Trump appointed Mark Uyeda as acting SEC chair two months ago, many investigations into crypto businesses have been dropped, as the SEC moves away from regulation by enforcement and works to create a framework for digital assets. As regulations become clearer and news flow turns more positive, crypto prices—which dropped sharply this week—should begin to better reflect the new regulatory landscape in the US.

We believe this regulatory shift could ultimately help trigger the next leg of the current bull run, as investors better understand the significance of regulatory clarity and seek to acquire bitcoin and altcoins at what we believe are currently very favorable levels.

Market Highlights

SEC Dismisses Crypto Enforcement Actions

The SEC dropped its enforcement actions against crypto-related companies Kraken, Consensys, and Cumberland DRW.

This indicates a shift in SEC’s regulatory approach, favoring clearer guidelines over enforcement actions. Such a pivot could foster a more predictable environment, encouraging innovation within the sector.

Banks to Engage in Crypto Activities

The FDIC has rescinded previous guidelines which prevented financial institutions from engaging with crypto activities without prior sign-off.

By removing bureaucratic hurdles, banks may more readily offer crypto-related services, potentially leading to broader adoption and integration of digital assets.

Bitcoin ETFs Inflow Streak Surpassed $1 Billion

US spot Bitcoin ETFs have recorded a 10-day inflow streak exceeding $1 billion marking the longest such streak in 2025.

This underscores growing institutional and retail investor confidence in Bitcoin as an asset class that helps increase market stability and possibly paving the way for the approval of other crypto-based financial products.

Market Metrics

All NCITM constituents had negative performance last week, with XRP (-10.8%) and UNI (-10.7%) seeing the steepest declines. ETH also experienced a sharp drop (-9.1%), contributing to NCITM’s underperformance relative to BTC (-2.9%). The NCITM -4.2% decline reflects a broader risk-off sentiment in the crypto market, as investors reassess their positions amid ongoing macroeconomic uncertainties.

NCITM (-4.2%) extended its underperformance last week, deepening year-to-date losses. Traditional indices like the S&P 500 (-1.5%) and Nasdaq 100 (-2.4%) saw smaller declines. The gap between crypto and other risk assets continues to widen, while gold has emerged as the top performer in 2025, gaining nearly 20% amid ongoing macroeconomic uncertainties. This trend highlights a growing risk-off sentiment, with investors shifting toward defensive assets and away from high-volatility investments.